Ego States
How people show up
Parent, Adult, and Child aren't labels — they're positions people move between in every interaction. Recognising them helps you understand why a retrospective suddenly feels like a telling-off.
The Approach
Organisational Transactional Analysis for Agile Team Coaching
A practical lens for the dynamics that Agile frameworks leave out — power, hidden contracts, team identity, resistance, and the relational patterns that make or break self-organisation.
Start here
Organisational TA helps Agile coaches work with the hidden dynamics that frameworks often miss: authority, contracts, resistance, team identity, and recurring relational patterns.
On this page you'll find:
The Problem
Agile frameworks structure work. They don't explain what's happening underneath.
Why does the same argument keep happening? Why does the sponsor quietly undermine every decision? Why does one person's silence control the room? These are not process problems. They are relational dynamics — and they need a relational language. That's what Organisational TA provides.
The Framework
What is Organisational Transactional Analysis?
Transactional Analysis was created by Eric Berne in the 1960s as a way to understand human interactions. Organisational TA applies those ideas to groups, teams, and systems — making visible the contracts, patterns, and power dynamics that shape how people work together.
It is not therapy. It is not psychoanalysis. It is a practical, evidence-based lens for anyone who works with teams and wants to understand what's really going on in the room. You do not need a TA qualification to use these ideas responsibly — you need to recognise the patterns and know where your boundary is.
Contracts
What people actually agree to
Every coaching engagement has a visible contract and an invisible one. TA gives you tools to surface the psychological contract — the unspoken expectations that derail coaching when left hidden.
Group Process
How teams form identity
Berne's Group Imago describes the mental map each person holds of their team. Until a team rewrites that map together, no amount of ceremony redesign will change how they relate.
The Language Gap
Where standard Agile coaching language runs thin
Agile has powerful words. But some of them create expectations they cannot fulfil — because they describe outcomes without addressing the relational dynamics that produce those outcomes.
"Empowerment" without authority clarity
Teams are told they're empowered, but no one has shifted actual decision rights. The word creates an expectation it cannot fulfil.
"Resistance" without relational framing
Change reluctance is treated as a people problem. TA reframes it as information about the relational field — something produced between people, not inside one person.
"Psychological safety" without power analysis
Safety talk ignores the authority structures, recognition patterns, and hidden contracts that determine whether people actually feel safe enough to speak.
"Team maturity" without group identity work
Maturity models describe stages but not the group imago — the shared mental map of who belongs, who matters, and how things work that a team must actively rewrite.
"Anti-patterns" without script awareness
Naming a pattern isn't the same as understanding the recurring script that produces it. TA Games analysis explains why the same dynamic keeps replaying.
The Gap
Four pain points TA helps you see clearly
Agile gives teams structure. Coaching gives teams space. But neither explains why the team keeps falling into the same argument, why the sponsor quietly undermines every decision, or why one person's silence controls the room. TA does.
Contracting
Your sponsor says 'empowered' but means 'compliant'
The three-cornered contract maps the real relationship between sponsor, coach, and team — including the psychological distance that distorts it.
Patterns
The same dysfunction keeps happening every Sprint
TA Games analysis helps you name the repetitive sequences where people unconsciously trade authentic interaction for familiar drama. Once named, the pattern loses its grip.
Resistance
The team resists every change you propose
Resistance isn't the problem — it's information. A co-creative TA lens reframes resistance as the team's attempt to protect something that matters to them.
Dependencies
The team can't make decisions without the lead
Symbiosis in TA terms means one person thinks for two, while the other acts for two. Spotting this pattern is the first step toward genuine shared ownership.
Key Concepts
Six TA concepts every Agile coach should know
You don't need a TA qualification to use these. You need to recognise the patterns in the room.
Contracting
Three-Cornered Contract
The sponsor, the team, and the coach each hold different expectations. If you don't contract with all three, hidden agendas will run your engagement.
Authority & Decision-Making
Psychological Contracts
Beyond the working agreement on the wall, every team carries unspoken expectations about safety, authority, and recognition. Surface them or watch them surface you.
Team Identity & Belonging
Group Imago
A team's mental map of who belongs, who matters, and how things work here. Rewriting this map is the real work of helping a team self-organise.
Conflict & Patterns
Games & Scripts
When teams keep ending up in the same conflict, the same blame cycle, or the same avoidance pattern — that's a game. TA helps you name it without shaming it.
Recognition & Motivation
Strokes & Recognition
People protect whatever gives them recognition. If the old system rewarded solo heroics, don't be surprised when shared ownership stalls. Change the recognition, change the behaviour.
Resistance & Adaptation
Drama Triangle
Persecutor, Rescuer, Victim — these roles rotate fast in pressured teams. The coach who spots the triangle early can intervene before it consumes the Sprint.
In Practice
What TA looks like in real coaching situations
These are situations most Agile coaches encounter regularly. TA doesn't replace your coaching — it gives you a sharper read on what's actually happening.
The sponsor says the team is empowered but vetoes every decision
What's often said: "They just need to step up and take ownership."
What TA reveals: A symbiotic contract where the sponsor holds the Thinking position and expects the team to Act without genuine authority transfer.
Coaching move: Raise the three-cornered contract. Name the gap between stated empowerment and actual decision rights. Contract explicitly for what 'empowered' means in practice.
One person silently dominates every discussion
What's often said: "They're just very experienced — the team looks up to them."
What TA reveals: An unspoken psychological contract where the team has assigned this person a Rescuer or Parent role. The group imago has a single slot filled and the rest are provisional.
Coaching move: Work with the group imago. Surface whose voice the team treats as final, and invite the team to redistribute recognition and authority.
The same blame cycle repeats every retrospective
What's often said: "The team just doesn't learn from its mistakes."
What TA reveals: A TA Game — a predictable sequence where someone initiates from a familiar position, others respond on cue, and everyone ends up feeling the same way. The payoff is confirming an existing script.
Coaching move: Name the pattern, not the people. Describe the sequence, invite the team to recognise it, and explore what they'd need to do differently at the choice point.
The team agrees to changes in the workshop but reverts within a week
What's often said: "They say yes but don't follow through — there's no accountability."
What TA reveals: The visible agreement was a social contract. The psychological contract — the unspoken expectations about safety, effort, and risk — was never updated.
Coaching move: Revisit the agreement as a psychological contract. Ask: what would it cost you to actually do this? What are you protecting by not doing it?
The Scrum Master does everything for the team
What's often said: "I just want to help — if I don't do it, nobody will."
What TA reveals: A symbiosis pattern where the SM over-functions (Parent/Adult) while the team under-functions (Adapted Child). Both sides maintain the arrangement because it meets a recognition need.
Coaching move: Surface the symbiosis with compassion. Help the SM see the cost of rescuing, and help the team see what they've delegated upward. Contract for graduated handback.
Case Examples
From surface to structure — three short cases
What's visible
A cross-functional team keeps missing Sprint Goals. The Product Owner is frustrated. The team says they need clearer requirements.
What's hidden
The team has never completed its group imago. Members relate to the PO as the authority and to each other as interchangeable parts. There's no shared identity or mutual accountability.
TA interpretation
The group imago is stuck at the provisional stage — members know who the leader is but haven't differentiated each other. The PO fills the only meaningful slot.
Coaching move
Facilitate group imago work: help the team name what each person uniquely contributes, what they need from each other, and what 'we' means beyond 'a group assigned to this backlog.'
What's visible
A new Agile coach is brought in. After three weeks, the team is polite but disengaged. The sponsor asks why there's no visible progress.
What's hidden
The previous coach was removed abruptly. The team's psychological contract includes 'coaches come and go — don't invest.' The sponsor's contract with the coach includes 'show results fast.'
TA interpretation
Two conflicting psychological contracts are operating. The team is protecting itself from another disruption. The sponsor is in a hurry that the team doesn't share.
Coaching move
Pause the rush for outcomes. Name the previous experience explicitly. Contract with the team about what they need in order to engage, and renegotiate the sponsor's timeline expectations.
What's visible
During a transformation, middle managers publicly support Agile but privately reassign work and override Sprint commitments.
What's hidden
The managers' psychological contract with the organisation rewards control and predictability. Agile threatens their recognition source — the stroke economy hasn't changed even though the structure has.
TA interpretation
The organisation changed its structure but not its stroke economy. Managers are protecting their recognition by maintaining the old patterns of influence.
Coaching move
Work at the stroke level: help leaders see what the new system recognises and rewards. Involve them in defining their coaching-compatible role rather than treating them as obstacles.
In the Book
Where to go deeper in the book
The Art of Creating Self-Organizing Teams doesn't teach TA as theory. It weaves TA into every stage of the coaching process — from first contact to sustained autonomy.
Part 2: Chapter 3
Sealing the Deal
Three-cornered contracts and psychological contracts. How to set up a coaching engagement that accounts for what people actually expect — not just what they say.
Part 2: Chapter 4
Rewriting the Team Imago
The group imago is the team's operating system. This chapter shows how to surface it, work with it, and help teams build a new shared identity.
Part 3: Chapters 7–9
Power Plays & Hidden Dynamics
Games analysis, psychological distance, and Micholt's framework for reading the sponsor-team-coach triangle when trust breaks down.
Part 3: Chapter 10
Resistance into Resilience
Co-creative TA applied to the most common coaching challenge: a team that agrees to change but doesn't follow through.
Go Deeper
Where to go next
Read
Use
Free Resource
Get the TA Cheat Sheet for Agile Coaches
A reference covering ego states, the drama triangle, psychological contracts, strokes, and group imago — all translated into agile coaching language. From Appendix A of the book.
No spam. Just the cheat sheet.
Bring Organisational TA to your teams
From downloading a reference sheet to inviting Roman for a full coaching partnership — there's a next step for wherever you are.